[JPL] "From the Plantation to the Penitentiary" - to The JazzStandard?

Bradley M. Stone bstone at science.sjsu.edu
Wed Mar 7 11:07:37 EST 2007


Jae et al.,
 
I'm certainly going to program Wynton's new release, partly because of the strong message - but (going back to our discussion on the intonations of horn and reed players) am I the only one who is having difficulty with Jennifer Sanon's intonation?
 
Brad

________________________________

From: jazzproglist-bounces at jazzweek.com on behalf of Jae Sinnett
Sent: Tue 3/6/2007 10:24 PM
To: Jazz Programmers Mailing List
Subject: Re: [JPL] "From the Plantation to the Penitentiary" - to The JazzStandard?



This Week's JPL Sponsor: SUMMIT RECORDS


Jim,
  
  I haven't heard the Douglas you're referring to but what I will say Wynton is not "married" to history on this recording or anything else for that matter. Nor did he "need" a vocalist to tell his story. The story is told the way it is because it was purposely written that way. That was a choice - not a necessity. Perhaps you're misunderstanding is compositional intentions...... What history are you referring to by the way? I don't hear much in this recording that could be relegated to him being "married" to the history. I hear points of departure but isn't that with everyone who plays today? I hear so many different things in his writing that I haven't heard before from him on this recording. His forms, harmonic choices, rhythmic structures are all fresh sounding to me. His organization is amazing on this CD. Then there is that message thing.....it's profound. Perhaps not to you and if there is anything that is for the "moment" this is it.
  
  Now you talk Douglas....I remember his "The Infinite" release and all the critics praising it. From what I heard it was simply an attempt to repeat Miles' late 60's vibe so I mean really....who's married to the history? Douglas plays from a visionary platform which I admire but from a swinging perspective I haven't heard much of it so perhaps that's why he's appealing more to a younger base - in the moment. Swinging phrasing is not the flavor of the moment with most critics today. Nor are II V structures. It seems the more you get away from that concept the more the critics like it. I'm also wondering how objective can critics be with Wynton today?  And by the way, who are you addressing when you say..."okay got that, you're both Wynton fans." See, I'm writing to you not around or at you. That's courtesy 101. 
  
  Jae Sinnett





More information about the jazzproglist mailing list