[JPL] I gave this article five stars.
ftapache1 at sbcglobal.net
Wed May 2 22:27:19 EDT 2007
I'll take the risk and believe that it was more than the fact he didn't like
it. I'm not a betting man usually but this is one bet I'll take.
Considering your fondness for Wynton I'll just consider the source and move
----- Original Message -----
From: <EdBride at aol.com>
To: <jazzproglist at jazzweek.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 3:15 PM
Subject: Re: [JPL] I gave this article five stars.
> This Week's JPL Sponsor: Voluntary Donors
> In a message dated 5/2/2007 11:35:23 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> Bobby.Jackson at ideastream.org writes:
> <<..JUST AN ADDENDUM....
> I remember Jim Wilke when you posted a critique of this work and told us
> that the critic gave it one star. I was appalled and let it be known
> then. When a critic gives a work like this ONE star, he has an agenda
> that never addressed the work. There's something else going on..>>
> That's a pretty risky assertion. It suggests (hell, it comes out and
> accuses) that someone who doesn't like the artistic content of the work
> must have
> dark motives. Might it be that the critic just didn't like it on its
> ************************************** See what's free at
> Send jazzproglist mailing list submissions to
> jazzproglist at jazzweek.com
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> jazzproglist-request at jazzweek.com
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> jazzproglist-owner at jazzweek.com
> Delivered to: ftapache1 at sbcglobal.net
More information about the jazzproglist