[JPL] Tatum/ GG BPhatB

Louis Erlanger louisx at verizon.net
Mon Jan 19 13:10:55 EST 2009

Here's info on the technology: http://www.zenph.com/technology.html

-----Original Message-----
From: jazzproglist-bounces at jazzweek.com
[mailto:jazzproglist-bounces at jazzweek.com] On Behalf Of EdBride at aol.com
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 12:42 PM
To: jazzproglist at jazzweek.com
Subject: Re: [JPL] Tatum/ GG BPhatB

Sponsored by: JazzWeek Summit 2009


In a message dated 1/19/2009 12:32:24 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
Bobby.Jackson at ideastream.org writes:

I wonder  how many people
would ask "Is that Art Tatum" on that Gordon Goodwin  recording, and how
many would actually find favor with the recording if  they didn't know
how the sausage was actually made.  In this day and  age of technology
we've seen doctoring with hip-hop sampling, Natalie Cole,  Kenny G, Ray
Charles and now Gordon Goodwin..>>
Perhaps I'm biased, being a bit of a big-band fanatic. But Goodwin's labor  
is something truly creative: he did not cobble existing parts from the
he  created the arrangement around one fixed element (Tatum's solo), which  
imposed certain limitation. 
Many of those other duets have a sense of the macabre, which is  an 
appropriate comment for today, Edgar Allen Poe's bicentennial.  Natalie
Cole's effort, 
to my mind, was truly from the heart. The bulk of the  others are technical 
Technical question: how was Tatum's participation engineered? Was a piano  
roll converted to electronic signals for an electronic piano, or into  
instructions for a physical/pneumatic player that would thus yield an
acoustic  piano 
**************Inauguration '09: Get complete coverage from the nation's 

Jazz Programmers' Mailing List: jazzproglist at jazzweek.com
List information: http://lists.jazzweek.com/mailman/listinfo/jazzproglist
List archive: http://lists.jazzweek.com/pipermail/jazzproglist/
Sponsorship information: jplsponsor at jazzweek.com

More information about the jazzproglist mailing list