[JPL] Woman Must Pay $1.5 Million for Illegally Downloaded Songs
drjazz at drjazz.com
Thu Nov 4 10:52:06 EDT 2010
Jammie Thomas-Rasset, the Minnesota woman who has been fighting the
recording industry over 24 songs she illegally downloaded and shared
online four years ago, has lost another round in court.
A jury in Minneapolis decided today that she was liable for $1.5 million
in copyright infringement damages to Capitol Records, or $62,500 for
each song she illegally shared in April 2006.
The Recording Industry Association of America--the trade group that
represents the four major music labels--applauded the verdict.
"We are again thankful to the jury for its service in this matter and
that they recognized the severity of the defendant's misconduct," the
RIAA said in a statement. "Now with three jury decisions behind us along
with a clear affirmation of Ms. Thomas-Rasset's willful liability, it is
our hope that she finally accepts responsibility for her actions."
Thomas-Rasset is expected to appeal today's judgment before Michael
Davis, the chief judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of
Minnesota, who had previously slashed the damage award in an earlier
judgment against Thomas-Rasset.
"We intend to raise our constitutional challenge again before Judge
Davis," Kiwi Camara, an attorney representing Thomas-Rasset, said in a
statement to CNET. "The fight continues."
The trial is the third for Thomas-Rasset, who was originally accused of
sharing 1,700 songs--enough to fill about 150 CDs. After one jury found
her liable for copyright infringement in 2007
<http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9791383-7.html> and ordered her to
pay $222,000, the judge in the case later ruled that he erred in
instructing the jury and called for a retrial. In the second trial,
which took place in 2009, a jury found Thomas-Rasset liable for $1.92
Thomas-Rasset subsequently asked the federal court for a new trial
<http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-10280531-93.html> or a reduction in
the amount of damages in July 2009.
But earlier this year, the judge found that amount to be "monstrous and
shocking" and reduced the amount to $54,000
<http://news.cnet.com/8301-31001_3-10439636-261.html>. Following that,
the RIAA informed Thomas-Rasset that it would accept $25,000--less than
half of the court-reduced award--if she agreed to ask the judge to
"vacate" his decision, which means removing his decision from the
record. Thomas-Rasset rejected
<http://news.cnet.com/8301-31001_3-10442482-261.html> that offer almost
/Updated at 8:20 p.m. PT with comment from Thomas-Rasset attorney, and
at 9:10 p.m. to emphasize the illegal sharing aspect of the copyright
Read more: http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-20021735-93.html#ixzz14KEtQ6SW
Dr. Jazz Operations
Oak Park, MI 48237
More information about the jazzproglist